"What makes her statement so powerful is that she’s not looking for a payout," said ABC News Chief Legal Analyst Dan Abrams. "So the argument that O’Reilly and his supporters have been making, which is everyone is looking for a buck, well, apparently, that’s not what she’s looking for." ABC News
Walsh didn’t come forward about her alleged harassment -
which took place approximately FOUR YEARS AGO, but comes forward with this
story now, in exchange for “nothing”? Yeah, nothing except to possibly
discredit a network and a a team of people that are "Administration-Friendly" and
the people that speak up about the ridiculous things that are happening in our
world.
I’m all about standing up for yourself, especially if you
are a woman, but IF WHAT HAPPENED WASN’T ENOUGH OF A BIG DEAL (FOR THE
INDIVIDUAL) TO COME OUT WITH HIS/HER STORY WHEN IT HAPPENED (or maybe a year
after it happened), and somehow she/he suddenly finds it in her/his heart to
share what “happened” to them now… I mean, I MUST TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT
THESE “SECRETS” MIGHT HAVE BEEN “REVEALED” FOR POLITICAL REASONS.
If this is the case, the women coming forward with these
allegations, only weaken future claims from women that are legitimately
affected by any type of harassment and sexual assault at the hands of a
predator. It is a sad day for me when I
distrust women’s intentions regarding “sexual assault” and “sexual harassment”
in the workplace. That’s the world I
live in. A world full of hidden agendas.
Speaking of "hidden agendas," I can't help but
think that "the buck” these women might be looking for is to just simply
discredit the media that’s questions “the “Liberals” and the “Virtue
Signalists'” motives. Lets be real here, not all "payment" or "reward" comes in the form of money.
Let me be clear that I am not saying that the “sexual
harassment” acts didn’t happen, but I am also not saying they did, because I
don’t know. No proof has been shown... yet. It’s just the word of humans
against other humans. And, as we all have seen, and very well know, humans LIE - and women are not exempt from this, we ARE human after all.
Show me proof and I will get on the bandwagon (like the famous “Locker room
talk” tape.) You have no proof? Then it never happened. Innocent until proven
guilty, people. That’s what the law states. Innocent until proven guilty. So,
until some proof comes out of the woodwork, I believe no-one in this circus.
A question remains in my head, will other women come forward
with claims of harassment stemming from CNN/NBC/ABC/etc. employees? Or are the
people employed by these news companies’ angels on earth? I’m betting the only
news channel that will get hit with this type of claims are the ones “fighting”
Liberalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment